Judges’ Legal Considerations in Cases of Sexual Violence Against Children

Authors

  • Sekar Mutiara Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati
  • Sanusi Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati
  • Ari Nurhaqi Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56593/khuluqiyya.v8i2.237

Keywords:

Sentencing Disparity, Sexual Violence Against, Judicial Consideration, Criminal Offense

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the judges' legal considerations in adjudicating criminal cases of sexual violence against children in Decision Number 17/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Cbn and Decision Number 343/Pid.Sus/2025/PN Sbr. This study is a normative or doctrinal legal research. The legal materials used consist of primary and secondary legal materials. The legal materials were collected through library research and subsequently analyzed qualitatively using a prescriptive approach and presented descriptively. The results indicate that although both cases applied the same statutory provisions, there is a significant difference in the criminal penalties imposed by the judges. In the first decision, the sentence imposed was more severe than the prosecutor’s demand. This can be justified because the defendant’s conduct was not limited to engaging in sexual intercourse with a child but also involved trafficking the victim for sexual purposes, from which the defendant gained financial benefits. Conversely, in the second decision, the sentence imposed was more lenient despite the victim becoming pregnant as a serious consequence of the offense. These differences were influenced by both juridical and non juridical considerations, as well as the judges’ orientation toward the objectives of sentencing. Nevertheless, the imposition of a lighter sentence in a case involving severe harm to the victim has the potential to undermine justice and create disparities in the level of legal protection afforded to child victims.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A’maludin, Risqi. “Analysis of the Judge’s Decision on Sexual Crimes Against Children (Study of the Decision of the Purwokerto District Court Number: 16/Pid.Sus-Child/2022/PN Pwt).” Proceedings Series on Social Sciences & Humanities 14, no. SE-Articles (November 16, 2023): 304–8. https://doi.org/10.30595/pssh.v14i.1054.

Ali, Nurul Fatwa, Sunariyo, and Muhammad Nurcholis Alhadi. “Disparitas Putusan Hakim Dalam Kasus Kekerasan Seksual Oleh Pelaku Anak.” Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 9, no. 4 (2025): 852–61. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24269/1s.v9i4.11418.

Aprilianda, Nurini, Mufatikhatul Farikhah, and Liza Agnesta Krisna. “Critical Review Selecting a Proper Law to Resolve Sexual Violence Against Children.” Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam 6, no. 2 (December 31, 2022): 954. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v6i2.9050.

Armia, Muhammad Siddiq, Zahlul Pasha Karim, A. Hamid Sarong, Muhammad Zulhilmi, and Muhammad Syauqi Bin-Armia. “Criticizing the Verdict of 18/JN/2016/MS.MBO of Mahkamah Syar’iyah Meulaboh Aceh on Sexual Abuse against Children from the Perspective of Restorative Justice.” AL-IHKAM: Jurnal Hukum & Pranata Sosial 17, no. 1 (June 29, 2022): 113–35. https://doi.org/10.19105/al-lhkam.v17i1.4987.

Bagenda, Charistina, Maria Alberta Liza Quintarti, Hanuring Ayu, Edwin, and Heri Budianto. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Kekerasan Seksual.” Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains 7, no. 9 (2024): 3502–6. https://doi.org/10.56338/jks.v7i9.6099.

Cahyaningrum, Novita, and Gelar Ali Ahmad. “Issue of Judicial Consideration in Acquittal (Vrijspraak) : Cases of Sexual Violence Against Children.” Veteran Law Review 8, no. 2 (December 11, 2025): 193–212. https://doi.org/10.35586/velrev.v8i2.12669.

Creswell, John, and J David Creswell. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage publications, 2017.

Erick, Benni, and Khairil Rizal. “Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Menjatuhkan Uqubat Terhadap Jarimah Pelecehan Seksual ( Studi Kasus Mahkamah Syar ’ Iyyah Aceh Barat ).” Jurnal Sosial Humaniora Sigli (JSH) 4, no. 2 (2021): 119–36.

Fardha, Katrin Valencia. “Perkembangan Teori-Teori Hukum Pidana.” INNOVATIVE: Journal Of Social Science Research 3, no. 5 (2023): 3982–91.

Haikal, Jenggis Khan. Analisis Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Menjatuhkan Putusan Bebas Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penipuan Jual Beli Tanah. Edited by Alfiatin. Purwokerto: Penerbit Amerta Media, 2023.

Hariyanto, Hariyanto, Ahmad Rezy Meidina, and Mabarroh Azizah. “Decentralization and the Fulfilments of Children’s Rights: Challenges and Opportunities for Local Government in Indonesia.” Lex Scientia Law Review 8, no. 2 (November 30, 2024): 677–706. https://doi.org/10.15294/lslr.v8i2.14373.

Ismail, Nurmala, Tri Syafari, Nam Rumkel, Program Studi, Magister Ilmu, and Pascasarjana Universitas Khairun. “Disparitas Sanksi Pidana Dalam Perkara Persetubuhan Terhadap Anak Di Pengadilan Negeri Soa-Sio.” HERMENEUTIKA 5, no. 2 (2021). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.33603/hermeneutika.v3i2.

Kirana, Yanti. Pelindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Sebagai Korban Kekerasan Seksual. Purwokerto: PT. Pena Persada Kerta Utama, 2023.

Lewis, Tiffany, Bianca Klettke, and Andrew Day. “Sentencing in Child Sexual Assault Cases: Factors Influencing Judicial Decision-Making.” Journal of Sexual Aggression 20, no. 3 (September 2, 2014): 281–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2013.804603.

MacMartin, Clare. “Judicial Constructions of the Seriousness of Child Sexual Abuse.” Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue Canadienne Des Sciences Du Comportement 36, no. 1 (January 2004): 66–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0087217.

Marbun, Andreas N. “Konsep Pemidanaan Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Jakarta, n.d.

Meidina, Ahmad Rezy, Zezen Zainul Ali, Mega Puspita, Hilma Nur Ashlakha, and Anisatuz Zahro. “What an Important Implementation of the Educational Rights of Adopted Children in Indonesia from an Islamic Jurisprudence Perspective?” El-Aqwal : Journal of Sharia and Comparative Law, May 31, 2024, 85–96. https://doi.org/10.24090/el-aqwal.v3i1.11125.

Nurhaqi, Ari. “Respon Nilai Keadilan Atas Keberlakuan Asas Legalitas Dalam Hukum Pidana.” Collegium Studiosum Journal 5, no. 1 (2022): 1–9.

Permana, Afrisyal Chandra, and Asmak Ul Hosnah. “Perlindungan Anak Sebagai Subjek Hukum : Tinjauan Terhadap Tanggung Jawab Negara Dalam Perfektif Ham.” Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum 3, no. 6 (2025): 9935–46. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.61104/alz.v3i5.2716.

Pratama, M. Mu’afilah Rizqi, Heni Siswanto, Deni Achmad, Erna Dewi, and Nikmah Rosidah. “Penerapan Pertimbangan Yuridis Dan Non-Yuridis Hakim Dalam Putusan Ringan Perkara Perdagangan Anak.” Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum 4, no. 2 (2026): 5017–25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.61104/alz.v4i2.4843.

Sanusi, Sanusi. “Diversion in the Settlement of the Criminal Act of Disposal of Infants.” JPPI (Jurnal Penelitian Penididikan Indonesia) 10, no. 1 (2024): 296–301. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29210/020243238.

Setiawan, Muhammad Bukhori. “THE JUDGE’S CONSIDERATION OF THE CHILD AS THE PERPETRATOR OF SEXUAL VIOLENCE THAT RESULTED IN THE VICTIM’S DEATH: AN ANALYSIS OF DECISION NUMBER 50/PID. SUS-ANAK/2024/PN PLG & 51/PID. SUS-ANAK/2024/PN PLG.” Ta’zir: Jurnal Hukum Pidana 9, no. 2 (n.d.): 107–16. https://doi.org/10.19109/tazir.v9i2.28734.

Setyawan, Iwan, Desi Yeni Pardede, and Stacie Stravinsky Chandra. “Legal Analysis of Punishment for Perpetrators of Violence Against Children in the Perspective of Substantive Justice (Study of Decision Number 103/Pid.Sus/2017/PN Psb).” JURNAL MERCATORIA 18, no. 1 (June 27, 2025): 102–14. https://doi.org/10.31289/mercatoria.v18i1.15346.

Sunardi, and Moh. Khandiq. Murtad Sebagai Pertimbangan Hakim Pengadilan Agama Dalam Menjatuhkan Putusan Perkara Perceraian. Edited by Urip Giyono. Edisi Pert. Jakarta: Damera Press, 2023.

Susilowati, Eny, Endrawati, and Mahdi Surya Aprilyansyah. “Kedudukan Dan Manfaat Logika Dalam Penalaran Hukum Oleh Hakim.” Jurnal Sociopolitico 6, no. 2 (2024): 190–202.

Syiyam, Ela Nur. “Dasar Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Dalam Menjatuhkan Pidana Mati Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual Terhadap Anak (Studi Analisis Putusan Nomor: 86/Pid.Sus/2022/PT.Bdg.).” Universitas Islam Negeri Prof. K. H. Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto, 2023.

Utomo, Setyo, Sri Ayu Septinawati, Sy Muhammad, Ridho Rizki, Maulufi Alkadrie, and Weni Sentia. “Pidana Bagi Pelaku Kejahatan Seksual Anak : Analisis Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2022.” Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains 7, no. 12 (2024): 4527–32. https://doi.org/10.56338/jks.v7i12.6458.

Waluyadi, and Ratu Mawar. “Kontribusi Penelitian Kemasyaratan Balai Pemasyarakatan ( BAPAS ) Untuk Mewujudkan Putusan Hakim Yang Berpihak Pada Anak.” Pandecta 16, no. 2 (2021): 250–65. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v16i2.30697.

Downloads

Published

26-07-22

How to Cite

Mutiara, S., Sanusi, & Nurhaqi, A. . (2026). Judges’ Legal Considerations in Cases of Sexual Violence Against Children. Khuluqiyya: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Studi Islam, 8(2), 305–316. https://doi.org/10.56593/khuluqiyya.v8i2.237

Issue

Section

Articles