Verstek Verdict Analysis Cumulation of Marriage Isbat and Divorce Lawsuit (Case Study Number: 135/Pdt.G/2022/PA.Pbg)

Authors

  • M. Nurhidayattulloh STAI Al-Hikmah 2 Brebes
  • Misbahul Huda STAI Al-Hikmah 2 Brebes

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56593/khuluqiyya.v6i1.122

Keywords:

Verstek Decision, Cumulation of Cases, Marriage Isbat, Divorce Lawsuit

Abstract

One of the problems in marriage law is divorce which is preceded by the practice of unregistered marriage. The decision with number: 135/Pdt.G/2022/Pa.Pbg is interesting to examine because it is the first verdict on the cumulative isbat marriage and divorce lawsuit at the Purbalingga Religious Court. The focus of the problem in this research is how the judge’s legal considerations are in the case of cumulating marriage isbat and divorce lawsuits in Decision Number: 135/Pdt.G/2022/Pa.Pbg and what the normative juridical review is. The research, including field research, is descriptive analysis using a normative juridical approach. Data collection techniques were carried out using observation, documentation and interviews. The results of the research showed that the panel of judges declared the marriage between the plaintiff and the defendant valid because they had fulfilled the requirements and terms of marriage and imposed the defendant’s talaq ba’in sughra on the plaintiff because the defendant had left the plaintiff within a period of 4 years and 9 months. The basic legal considerations used by the judge in deciding case Number: 135/pdt.g/2022/Pa.Pbg are in accordance with statutory regulations and Islamic law

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aah Tsamrotul Fuadah, Hukum Acara Peradilan Agama Plus Prinsip Hukum Acara Islam Dalam Risalah Qadha Umar Bin Khattab (Depok: Rajawali Pers, 2019)

Abdul Manan, et al., Pedoman Pelaksanaan Tugas Dan Administrasi Peradilan Agama (Jakarta: Peradilan Agama, 2010).

Al Imam Abu Abdullah Muhammad Bin Ismail, Shahih Bukhari, terj. Achmad Sunarto, et al., (Vol.7; Semarang: CV. Asy Syifa’, 1991).

Aulia Muthiah, Hukum Islam Dinamika Seputar Hukum Keluarga (Yogyakarta: Pustaka Baru Press, 2022).

Herzien Inlandsch Reglement, Reglemen Indonesia

http://pa-barabai.go.id/kepaniteraan/persidangan/tahapan.html.

https://lsc.bphn.go.id/konsultasiView?id=3624.

https://ms-aceh.go.id/layanan-hukum-hak-masyarakat/tahapan-penanganan-perkara.html.

https://www.legalAkses.com/pemanggilan-penggugat-dan-tergugat-dalam-sidang-perdata/.

Imam Taqiyuddin Abu Bakar Bin Muhammad Al Husaini, Kifayatul Akhyar, ter. Syarifuddin Anwar, Misbah Musthafa. (Vol.2; Surabaya: CV. Bina Iman, 2007).

Intruksi Presiden Nomor 1 Tahun 1991 tentang Kompilasi Hukum Islam di Indonesia

Jamaluddin, Nanda Amalia, Buku Ajar Hukum Perkawinan (Sulawesi: Unimal Press, 2016).

Lanka Asmar, Mohd. Ridhwan Ismail, Teori Dan Praktik Perkara Pengesahan Perkawinan Di Pengadilan Agama (Bandung: CV. Mandar Maju, 2021).

M. Yahya Harahap, Hukum Acara Pedata Tentang Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian dan Putusan Pengadilan (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2019).

Mahmud Kusuma, “Pengertian dan Peraturan Penggabungan Gugatan”, https://www.hukumindo.com/2020/06/pengertian-dan-pengaturan-penggabungan.html.

Neli Sama Kamalia, “Asas Pasif dan Aktif Hakim Perdata serta Relevansinya dalam Konsep Kebenaran Formal,” https://www.pa-rumbia.go.id/berita-seputar-peradilan/364-asas-pasif-dan-aktif-Hakim-perdata-serta-relevansinya-dalam-konsep-kebenaran-formal.

Rizem Aizid, Fikih Keluarga Terlengkap (Yogyakarta: Laksana, 2018).

Royan Bawono, “Analisis Hukum Tentang Isbat Nikah Menurut KUH Perdata dan KHI,” Journal Lentera Vol 4, No, 2 Juli-Desember 2022.

Salinan Putusan Pengadilan Agama Purbalingga Nomor : 135/Pdt.G/2022/PA.Pbg.

Sigar Aji Poerana, “Ilmu Hukum”, https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/perbedaan-sifat-putusan-deklaratoir-konstitutif-dan-kondemnatoir-It58ed9048160ee.

Sudirman, Hukum Acara Peradilan Agama (Sulawesi Selatan: IAIN Parepare Nusantara Press, 2021).

Tafsir Al-Madinah Al-Munawwarah / Markaz Ta'dzhim al-Qur'an di bawah pengawasan Syaikh Prof. Dr. Imad Zuhair Hafidz, professor fakultas al-Qur'an Universitas Islam Madinah https://tafsirweb.com/start-sharing.html#no-list.

Tio Feby Ahmad, “Hak Ex Officio Dan Ultra Petitum Partium Hakim Pengadilan Agama Dalam Menentukan Nafkah Iddah Dan Mut’ah,” (Paper, Pengadilan Agama Tasikmalaya Kelas 1 A, Tasikmalaya, 2019).

Umarwan Sutopo, Martha Eri Safira, Neneng Uswatun Khasanah, Hukum Acara Peradilan Agama Dalam Teori Dan Praktik (Ponorogo: CV. Nata Karya, 2021).

Undang-undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2019 Tentang perubahan Atas Undang-undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan

Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.

Zainuddin bin Abdul Aziz Al-Malibari Al-Fannani, Fathul Muin, terj. Moch Anwar, Bahrun Abu Bakar, Anwar Abu Bakar. (Bandung: Sinar Baru Algesindo, 2013).

Downloads

Published

24-05-04

How to Cite

Nurhidayattulloh, M., & Huda, M. (2024). Verstek Verdict Analysis Cumulation of Marriage Isbat and Divorce Lawsuit (Case Study Number: 135/Pdt.G/2022/PA.Pbg). Khuluqiyya: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Studi Islam, 6(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.56593/khuluqiyya.v6i1.122

Issue

Section

Articles